Phoney Manson links

Prompted by a screenshot posted on a Facebook page I have been inspired to examine this image in greater detail and delve, once again, into the wonderful world of Iamaphoney.

The screenshot is taken from Iamaphoney’s video, ‘Studycloud Book 1904’, and seems to suggest the intriguing possibility that Paul McCartney and Charles Manson were friends, or were, at the very least, acquainted.

The Manson / Beatle links, which are a major feature of Iamaphoney’s productions, stem largely from Beatle White Album era lyrics and Manson’s deluded notion of Helter Skelter, whereby racial war would be initiated by oppressed blacks against the white majority, and via the ‘Helter Skelter’ and ‘1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 all good children go to heaven’ graffiti written on a door at the Spahn Ranch.

The Spahn Ranch was also a location for one Iamaphoney’s suitcases; this is a theme we shall return to.

Manson claimed that The Beatles were speaking to him directly through lyrics on the White Album, an album the band were working on at the time of McCartney’s US trip and when, according to Tony Bramwell, McCartney was playing new Beatle tracks to fans. I guess it is somehow therefore possible that Manson could have heard these songs before their release? I find this unlikely though.

We are also talking of a time just a month after McCartney reportedly quit the band (see my previous post) and yet here he is in L.A. to big-up the Beatles’ latest initiative.

So, who wrote the note that appears in the Iamaphoney video? Well, there does appear to be a signature but I cannot make it out. One candidate, as speculated on Facebook, is Linda McCartney nee Eastman. On the face of it this would be a good guess, the date in the top right corner, June 22, 1968, is written in the American format and, furthermore, it is on that very date that Linda and Paul fell in love. So says Tony Bramwell anyway.

Dear Tony does indeed provide quite a bit of detail of the itinerary that day, enough at any rate to ascertain that McCartney was indeed in L.A. at that time and could, theoretically, have met with Manson, particularly given McCartney and the band’s friendship with The Beach Boys (Manson, and his family, having spent time living with Beach Boy, Dennis Wilson. The date is interesting though. It would imply that it was the previous night – 21^st June – that was spent under the stars. So, is this possible? McCartney and company flew from London to New York on the 20^th, whereupon McCartney immediately contacts Linda and leaves a message. They then catch an internal flight to L.A. and arrive at some point on the 20^th or 21^st. Bramwell makes clear that Linda is waiting for Paul after they had made a presentation to Capitol on the 22^nd, so, it would seem unlikely that Linda was the author.

Evidence of her handwriting is scarce but I would wager that some of this diary extract was written by her.

Paul McCartney’s handwriting can be seen just to the right of the horse’s head, so the rest, including the American spelling of colour (color) is presumably hers? It doesn’t resemble that on the screenshot.

Example of McCartney's handwriting

These diary extracts are a recurring theme in Iamaphoney’s work and I have speculated in the past that they are extracts from a diary stolen from McCartney by two Italian girls.

Interestingly, the same diary extract can be seen in this screenshot;

This was taken from a short-lived YouTube video that appeared shortly before Mike NL released his Billy and Me interview with Billy Martin. The video also featured an image of a decapitated Sharon Tate. I believe that Mikey produced this video.

This is suggestive, if not conclusive, of an attempt to provide further links between the IAAP vids and the Manson theme.

Tony Bramwell, who so helpfully provides the detail of Macca’s movements on the day in question, is pivotal in the whole mythology of the PID hoax. This interview is particularly telling;

E.C.: I just finished reading a book about the "Paul Is Dead" phenomena (TURN ME ON DEAD MAN- which we are reviewing in EAR CANDY). And this book mentions the phone call that you made to the radio station pretending to be Paul.

Tony Bramwell: Oh do they?

E.C.: It was great find reading your confession that it was YOU who called the radio station imitating Paul and that they used it for some kind of voice analysis to "prove" that there was indeed another Paul. I know that Paul told you to deal with it, and you discussed it with Derek Taylor (who seemed just annoyed at all the calls coming in to Apple). How exactly did that come about?

Tony Bramwell: It just got so tiresome, the phone calls and the constant harassment from the press and radio and media. I just got fed up with it. So I just put me Paul voice on and said, “No, me? I’m sitting here drinking a cup of tea” or whatever. Because Paul wasn’t being helpful because he was up in Scotland…and The Beatles had folded. When it became 24 hours a day, 24-7 or whatever you call it, just denying that Paul is dead, I just thought, “I can’t take any more of this” – so I pretended I was him. I can’t remember which disc jockey I even did it with, I think it was one in Canada or Miami or whatever.

E.C.: Did Derek agree with you about the call?

Tony Bramwell: I mean it was disrupting the entire Apple industry Just 24-7 of “Paul’s dead, who’s the imposter? Billy Shears or Billy Campbell?”

It was quite fun for a while, then it just too much. I just had to try and stop it because nothing else was getting done.

E.C.: Did you "script" out what you were going to say? (They put some of the transcript into the book.)

Tony Bramwell: No, no, I just answered the phone and thought, “I’m gonna be Paul” and did that.

E.C.: And they fell for it?

Tony Bramwell: Well, I suppose so.

Apollo C. Vermouth, my favourite forum poster, claimed that there were two McCartney vocal imitators and this lends credence to the theory Bramwell was one of them.

Bramwell also wrote a lengthy write up of the trip for The Beatles Monthly which, whilst not once mentioning Linda, talks about a yacht trip that they took. The accompanying pictures though are of another boat trip, this time in New York, and includes the famous photo of the three Paul’s!

So, could then our mysterious letter writer be Tony Bramwell? Again I have struggled to find an example of his handwriting.

Signatures aren’t indicative enough of an individual’s handwriting to go on and the American date format on the letter would seem to rule Bramwell out. However, a year ago I posted about a series of new images I had found at the Iamaphoney website and here we do seem to get a handwriting match.

I am no expert in handwriting but they seem pretty close to my untrained eye. In conclusion, I would have to suggest that either the McManson note is fake and has been perpetrated by someone within the Iamaphoney camp to create / enhance the Manson links, or, Iamaphoney’s material is being given to him by someone inside the McCartney camp. I have long speculated that this person was Neil Aspinall, however, we should also consider what Tony Bramwell’s role in all this is?

Sometime ago I copied an image from Shaun Weiss’ (son of Beatle’s lawyer Nat) Facebook page;

Again I have no idea whose handwriting this is but it is certainly similar to the writing in the McManson image and is definitely the same as the handwriting in the photos from old phoney’s page; compare the W’s.

So, this is either a blatant forgery or someone from the Beatle camp is providing themes for IAAP.

The above image – cropped from another above – is interesting as, not only is the handwriting similar but, it also links to Aleister Crowley’s Book of the Law. The Book of the Law is the theme of the Iamaphoney video from where the McManson screenshot is taken and the video attempts to link PID, or McCartney at any rate, with Crowley and his Thelema religion. It also mentions Dr Richard Asher, who once said of Pel Ebstein fever that it existed only because it had a name.

The Book of the Law was written in Cairo in 1904 when Crowley claimed it was dictated to him by a discarnate entity named Aiwass. This information is interpreted by Iamaphoney as being an explanation for the caption ‘I Was’ that appears in the Magical Mystery Tour movie.

All of which is very interesting when compared to the information contained within the Iamaphoney suitcase discovered at the Spahn Ranch.

Not only do we have a copy of the Book of the Law but also the ‘I Was’ image from Magical Mystery Tour.

Also in the suitcase was a copy of the Magic Christian L.P.

All of which seems to be a clear attempt to try and link McCartney and Manson to the workings of Aleister Crowley. Crowley was a master manipulator who was linked to more than one murder whilst Manson was clearly the same, able as he was to manipulate his protégée’s to murder on his behalf; PID is an attempt to manipulate the masses whilst Iamaphoney seeks to perpetuate the same myth. So does this help to explain the inclusion of this diary extract in the video?

An expanded version of which is this;

Which is taken from here.

It is surely not coincidental that the stolen diary extract shows an entry saying ‘Paul leaves Beatles’ and is from the anniversary of Crowley finishing the Book of the Law?

We are being manipulated into believing that McCartney knew Manson, presumably because this would tie in to a larger theme, namely that of mind-control. Crowley used sexual rituals to elicit control whilst Manson did the same thing, whilst rumours abound that, in reality, both were themselves being manipulated from above. Is Iamaphoney proposing that McCartney did the same? If nothing else we are being pointed in the direction of the date of Paul and Linda getting together, so why?

Look again at the McManson screenshot; the son at the end of McManson has been written over, as if to emphasis its importance.

We are all sons of the magician because we are all prey to exactly the same manipulation.

I will leave you with a series of screenshots from the video of Iamaphoney's signature flashing, embedded images. These include a series of letters that appear.

EMI (Beatles record company)

TG

NIR (Nothing is Real?)

P (Paul?)

TI

SS (SuperStone?)

I have no idea what it means, maybe it is an anagram (simpering tits being my favourite) or a message? Your thoughts are, as ever, welcome.

In memory of Cynthia Lennon who sadly passed away today.

The Curious Affair of the Mad March Red Herring’s

Firstly, please allow me to apologise for the paucity of material of late, however, inspiration has been sparse in the extreme and, dear reader, what is an artist without his muse? 

That said, how could I not be inspired by the events of the last week as it appears the game is now afoot Watson.

Firstly we had the story PIDers have been waiting years for, confirmation from Ringo that Paul did indeed die in 1966; http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/former-beatle-ringo-starr-claims-the-real-paul-mccartney-died-in-1966-and-was-replaced-by-look-alike/%C2%A0

 

Now, OMG if that doesn’t that put an almighty spanner in my theory that PID is total BS! But, hold on, @TEOTD maybe this is just 2G2BT so, how I LMAO when I discovered that the spoof story had already disappeared from the www. 

Disappeared you say Holmes, but how could that possibly be so? 

Well, click on the link above and see what comes up [Spoiler Alert: It’s an error message]. But, whilst there please have a quick look at the website’s disclaimer;

WNDR assumes however all responsibility for the satirical nature of its articles and for the fictional nature of their content. All characters appearing in the articles in this website – even those based on real people –  are entirely fictional and any resemblance between them and any persons, living, dead, or undead is purely a miracle.

© New World Order Media you say? Surely the New World Order is above needing to enforce copyright?

So, my dear Watson it is all a load of old bollocks my friend.

However, not slow to cash in on the success of their ruse, the good people at New World Order Media then came up with this follow-up; http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/paul-mccartney-refutes-ringo-starrs-allegations-that-he-died-in-1966-3/

 

Now, whilst pretty much the entire story is contained within the link heading, for those of you keen to check the accuracy of my diligent sleuthing I would suggest clicking that link pretty darn quick, as one fears it won’t be alive long.

Unlike, of course, the erstwhile Sir Paul McCartney who will be in attendance next month when his dear ‘senile’ old pal, Ringo Starr, is initiated into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. 

The above story – by Barbara Johnson whose bio states ‘Barbara Johnson is a young reporter who has made a name for herself thanks to her thorough researching and formal writing style. A former pornstar, she has rapidly reached the summit in her new profession thanks to her good looks and "social" skills.’ – regurgitates the tale of Bettina Hübers, Paul’s possible German love child, and does contain a (recent?) photo of Bettina looking fuck-all like McCartney. 

That said, far be it for me to disparage the claim of Frau Hübers whose poor old Mutter may well have been goosed by a randy Scouser, or two, back in the day. Good luck to her and her money grabbing embezzlement schemes I say.

However, whilst the story may have got Facebook's plastic propagandist’s in a tizzy and, simultaneously, moistened the panties of many an ardent PIDer, it is, total and utter bullshit. One wonders then why the two wealthy and ennobled individuals who are being slandered therein have, apparently, let it go without legal recourse.

Perhaps they believe in that ancient Barnum maxim that ‘all publicity is good publicity’? Well, PID is certainly a circus and Mr Starr does have a record to sell so, who knows? 

Which brings us to Michael Herring – a fishy name if ever I heard one – who also has some Beatle related tat, sorry, product to sell; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2984386/PICTURE-EXCLUSIVE-Never-seen-images-Beatles-1968-George-Harrison-carrying-Paul-McCartney-s-resignation-letter-shirt-pocket.html

 

He aims to boost the clamour for his never-seen-before photos by claiming that the convenient scrap of paper popping out of George Harrison’s top pocket is, in actual fact, Paul McCartney’s letter of resignation from the Beatles, despite no evidence for the existence of this letter ever having made it into the realm of the public domain.

Conveniently for Mr Herring the two people in the photograph who could corroborate his claim are now dead (actually dead, not fake dead) and Paulie, or is that Faulie, is keeping shtum on the matter. 

Now, once again, far be it from me to say that this is just an ingenious way of extracting a few extra noughts from a mug-punter at the auction, but the article, in that ever-reliable and never knowingly xenophobic mouthpiece the Daily Mail, does claim that; ‘There was a knock on the door. George opened it and there was a personal delivery guy (that would be the Postman then?). He handed him this pale blue letter. George read it and passed it to John.’   

Pale blue letter? Call me colour-blind but whatever that object is that is protruding from George’s shirt pocket looks pretty damn white to me. Whatever. Now if I had a time-machine and I could travel back to 1968 I would have to advise Paul, or is that Faul, to never trust a legal firm that uses pale blue stationery. Not only will it look like plain old white in any subsequent photographs but its recepients will simply ignore it with bugger all consequences ensuing.

It may be pertinent to note that rather than spend their time worrying about the cute one's impending departure, the band simply got on and wrote a song - Revolution No. 9 - with backwards lyrics that may, or may not, say 'turn me on, deadman'. Which is, even by the far-out standards of the swinging sixties, a pretty weird request!

So, whilst there seems to be little, actual, evidence that Paul, or is that Faul, was looking to quit the band in May 1968, the question must be asked, if Paul was replaced, by Faul, in 1966 and handed on a silver-platter this wonderful world of fame, wealth, sex, drugs and influence then why did the ungrateful tosser look to pack it all in after a mere eighteen months? 

I am reminded of an enigmatic quote by my favourite forum-poster, Apollo C. Vermouth (about whom more can be discovered here); 

Greetings

…. Remember that show on the telly, "Bewitched"? The original actor playing Darrin passed away. They quickly replaced him with another actor, to keep the show intact. Now, the original Darrin needn't have died. Maybe, he just said "fook it" and headed for greener pastures. Went on holiday, so to speak. But, to keep the original premise in place, somebody had to assume the role.

Now imagine, if you will, that scenario in context to this "mystery." Only in this case, the original Darrin came back to the show, after his fancy of leaving proved to be not quite in his best interest. By then, the show was on the "outs", and the cast grew tired of each other, thus putting an end to the show. Now, each blamed the other for the demise, for whatever reason they could muster, and went their separate ways. It's kinda like that. Only different. I told ya I was disturbed.

Apollo

So once more we must ponder the undecipherable question at the heart of this enigma: is this some surreal attempt at manipulating reality to mess with our heads or, was there, in fact, a temporary McCartney replacement?

One man, or organisation, who may know is Iamaphoney, aka Billy Martin, who, not so coincidentally, appears to be emerging from his golden slumbers and issuing forth new(ish) material under a staggering array of pseudonyms. 

I dare say there are many more identities to which I am not yet privy, though also back from the dead is Miles Denton Oliver (google him and iamaphoney) who sent me this charming comment to my YouTube account; 'how is it being a real wanna-be MilesDeo?  Stealing other peoples identity,Eh? It is uacceptable in all matters - It is NOT a legal thing to do. Please drop your account or I have important friends in positions you would only dream about, you phoney!  Please step back and let the real Miles Deo be back again!

i am with iamaphoney'

He is with Iamaphoney you know, and, as confirmation he posted this:-


Now I am sure I haven't the slightest clue what he is on about but does the dear boy not know that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!

Possibly the org, as they so quaintly like to be known, are just regurgitating old material under new monikers, but what, one wonders, has prompted this flurry of activity at exactly the same time that these false flag stories are released?

Perhaps this image from the phoney one’s website is telling?

I am particularly intrigued by the handwritten note at the top that seems to read ‘Paul got more and more obsessed with his alter ego, Ian Iachimoe. As well as being the cute one he'd like to be the ugly one two. Like his father was a freemason. Dr Asher, possessed by the book of the law.’

I cannot be eaxctly sure that is what it says, my trusty magnifying glass is not sharp enough, but is it a possible plotline revealed? Who knows? Only the phoney Moriarty can be sure. Perhaps, Sir, you could let me know? You know who I am.